PB: COW Meeting – Finally, SDM Writes a Report
by SDM
Okay, SDM has been slacking off lately. SDM admits it, but has a valid excuse.
The COW meeting on January 16th was boring. In fact, SDM would go so far as to say that we as taxpayers are fortunate there will not be a Committee of the Whole in February because nothing seems to be accomplished at these meetings. Nevertheless, SDM knows this blog’s readers are a demanding bunch, so here are some lowlights:
Election Date Indecision
Councilman Fiore added an item to the agenda that represents a significant cost to village taxpayers. Namely, when the village should hold its elections.
SDM’s intelligent readers will recall that last cycle, the village’s primary election was held on the general election day during the first week of November. The runoff was held a few weeks later after Veteran’s day and right after Thanksgiving, virtually ensuring a low turnout – at least low for our community.
Of course, while our local ballot was clogged with nonsense, no one thought to propose a charter amendment that would schedule Palmetto Bay’s primary election to coincide with the county primary election. Why should we save a couple hundred thousand dollars just so our general election can be held at the same time everyone else votes?
SDM Codebreaker: Like most things in politics, there are good reasons to hold a runoff election when most people are thoroughly sick of campaigns. Regular people put away their voting brains after the Presidential or gubernatorial election is over and go on with their lives. Only the obsessed go out and vote at the end of November – the nutty people like SDM. The politicians like to have the nutty people vote because those hard core voters are easy to identify, which makes pandering to them so much easier. Thus, even your sainted Palmetto Bay pols prefer to face a runoff in late November, even if doing so costs the village and the county more money.
SDM Says: Hold the village primary in September and the runoff in November so we can save some money and get on with our lives, for crying out loud.
Robert’s Rules of Disorder
They say life imitates art. Well, SDM Says: politics imitates life.
You know how everyone reads all those books about creating personal budgets and then they just go about their lives without ever adopting or following a budget?
Well, your government does the same thing with its rules of procedure, also known as Robert’s Rules of Order.
Apparently, observing this conundrum caused Councilman Schaffer to ask an eminently reasonable question, which SDM paraphrases this way: Why does the council say that it follows Robert’s Rules of Order when in fact it does no such thing?
The good councilman went on to wonder whether the council follows any rule other than the Rule of Shelley – meaning whatever the whim of the Mayor might be on any given day or at any given moment.
Oh, the innocence…
SDM Codebreaker: The Marathon Man has stumbled across one of the great truths about government, which is that government really follows the whims of its leaders. Following Robert’s Rules is a pain in the butt and doing so would get in the way of the freight train politics the Three Amigos worship.
SDM Says: Don’t waste your time trying to fix the rules of order, Mr. Schaffer. You were elected to speak and to lead and if you let the Mayor have her way, you will sit mute for the next four years. Follow SDM’s Rules of Order: Speak loudly first and ask forgiveness later.
Electric Cars are like a One Iron
Yes, our newest amigo says so. Go to the tape if you think SDM is full of crap.
According to Mr.Schaffer, buying an electric Volt car is like having a one iron in your golf bag. Do not ask SDM to explain this analogy, SDM cannot help you out. Watch the meeting and comment below if you can decipher what the heck he is saying.
The important thing to note here is that the village appears to be thinking before it runs off willy nilly to purchase the latest in green gadgets – super expensive electric cars. This despite village staff’s intense belief that purchasing or leasing Chevy Volts will end up saving money. Well, SDM has conceived a compromise.
SDM Says: Let’s put this theory to a real test. Pick a staffer who supports the Volt purchase and make that person responsible for this project. If the Volt saves the village money after some reasonable term (maybe 5 years), give that staffer a cash bonus equal to half the savings. If the Volt ends up costing the village during that time, the staffer’s salary will be cut by half the village’s loss.
SDM Wonders: Will our intrepid staff be willing to put their money where their mouth is?
Palmetto Bay should be following the Roberts Rules of Order. Here is a link to the minutes form the very first village council meeting held on November 7, 2002: http://issuu.com/southdadeupdates/docs/palmettobay.minutes-11-7-2002 I am not sure why there seems to be a disconnect. The meetings should be orderly if one follows the proper rules of procedure. I also suggest that interested persons should review Palmetto Bay’s procedure code – 2-47. It was amended at my last meeting held on October 4, 2010.
I also suggest that you look up Municode and reivew section 4-48. – Rules of debate: http://library.municode.com/HTML/14016/level4/COOR_CH2AD_ARTIICO_DIV2ME.html#COOR_CH2AD_ARTIICO_DIV2ME_S2-48RUDE
(j) Parliamentarian. Except as provided by this code and any applicable laws, Robert’s Rules of Order shall be applied to all questions of procedure which might be asked by members at regular and special meetings of the village council. The village attorney shall provide an opinion on all questions of order by applying Robert’s Rules of Order. The opinion of the village attorney on a question may be overridden upon a majority vote of the council.
(k) Suspension of the rules. No rule of procedure adopted by the council shall be suspended except by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the councilmembers present.
(l) Synopsis of debate. The village clerk may be directed by the mayor, with the consent of the council, to enter in the minutes a synopsis of the discussion on any question coming before the council.
I am available to anyone that has questions about the process.
And I did leave out a few additional nuggets. I direct everyone’s attention to Sec. 2-49. – Council discussion, public participation and decorum. Sec. 2-49. – Council discussion, public participation and decorum.:
http://library.municode.com/HTML/14016/level4/COOR_CH2AD_ARTIICO_DIV2ME.html#COOR_CH2AD_ARTIICO_DIV2ME_S2-49CODIPUPADE
(a) Discussion by councilmembers. Discussion by councilmembers shall be unlimited except as determined by a majority of the council. The councilmember who sponsors an item shall be afforded the privilege to close with rebuttal. A member, once recognized by the mayor, shall direct all comments or questions on the item being discussed to the mayor only. Councilmembers shall not engage in cross conversation with other members or with the public. Councilmembers shall not interrupt another member who has the floor. The mayor shall not unreasonably withhold or delay recognition of any member of the council desiring to speak. The mayor shall recognize other members of the council in rotation and not call on any member a second time or subsequent time until all members shall have had an opportunity to speak.
(b) Questions by councilmembers. In the event a member wishes to direct questions to another member or to the public during a meeting, the questions shall be directed to the mayor who, in turn, will recognize the councilmember or member of the public who wishes to answer the specific questions. In the event a member wishes to direct a question to the village manager or village attorney, the question shall be directed to the manager or attorney through the mayor, who will, in turn, recognize the member. All questions of village staff shall be made through the village manager.
Note that “Councilmembers shall not interrupt another member who has the floor.” This includes the Mayor and Vice mayor. This is probably the most violated section of the procedural rules.
Reading and following the rules would benefit both members of the council and members of the public.
To Volt or Revolt, That is the Question
By the attitude of the council members, it appears that the Volt purchase is dead. However, that is not the real question. The real question is, do we need a new vehicle at all. At last weeks Cow meeting, I suggested that we didn’t need to hire and additional code compliance guy. Therefore, no vehicle would be needed for him, thus saving the Village over $100,000 a year in salary, benefits car payments gas and repairs.
What I got for my efforts was the Mayor lambasting me about not bringing this question forward last year before the budget was voted on. (Not that it would have made any difference) She further went on to tell me that since it was already budgeted for, we could not stop the hiring of this person and then buying this person a car.
WHAT DID SHE SAY? Because it’s in the budget we must spend the money even though it could be foolish and not needed. I can point too much bigger issues that were in other budgets and then not funded or voted against later. But I won’t bore you with that.
The Mayor lied to me and to all of you once again, the sad part is, she knows it. Why is she so hell bent on hiring a code compliance guy? Maybe because it’s one more person driving around town looking in YOUR backyard for code violations? Why isn’t the Mayor mad? She had her illegal shed ripped down because a code compliance guy looked in her backyard and gave her a code violation?
I THINK I’M GOING INSANE.
People listen up, the budget is a fluid living document. It’s a guideline of how to spend our money. It can and should be tweaked as we go along. Spend the money where necessary and don’t spend it when it’s not. That’s pretty simple. I wonder how the Mayor runs her own budget at home. If she goes to Publix to buy some meat and had planed on spending $10 per pound, but the meats on sale for $5 per pound, what do you think she should do? I would recommend spending the $5 and put the excess money back in to the bank and don’t spend it until some other necessity comes along.
Sounds simple to me.
It would be nice to see staff take the risk, but Mayor Stanczyk should be called upon to the the challenge. Stanczyk never misses a chance to spend our tax dollars to gain herself camera time. How about it mayor, are you willing to put up your own money? And we mean really escrowing the money with a third party, not merely saying your in and then being nowhere to be found in 5 years.