South Dade Matters

Looking at the World South of Miami: Palmetto Bay, Cutler Bay, Pinecrest, South Miami and Miami-Dade County.

Tag: Joan Lindsay

PB Guest Post by David Singer

The end of a disaster

Over the past six years there have been individuals on this council and in our community who have lectured on the importance of citizen’s rights. These same individuals have held themselves out to be honorable, respectable and trustworthy leaders of the Village of Palmetto Bay. These are the same individuals who maintain they know what Palmetto Bay residents yearn for when it comes to “quality of life”. These are also the same individuals who have stated time and time again they know what’s best for the Village of Palmetto Bay. They are the ones who say “follow me, I will lead you”.

What if tomorrow Palmetto Bay residents actually woke up and found out that these individuals are not who they pretend to be? What if as a community we finally realized that these individuals who were placed in power, whether it’s Mayor Stanczyk, certain council members including Joan Lindsay or a spouse of an elected official, believe they are due an entitlement at the expense of the community? That these individuals have held certain Palmetto Bay institutions to a higher standard then they hold for themselves? That these individuals will bend the truth at every available moment and discriminate against anyone who does not agree with their political agenda? That these individuals believe that laws and rules don’t apply to them? That these individuals have passed zoning laws for the benefit of a small minority of residents because they truly believe in the motto “do what I say, not what I do”?

So here we finally are, remedying an injustice that was perpetrated on Palmer Trinity for the last 6 years. Of course this same group I refer to do not believe that Palmer Trinity should be considered a member of our community. They actually feel that anyone or any institution other than taxpaying residents should not have the same rights as they have. They feel that wasting over a million dollars to stop the expansion of Palmer Trinity was justified when the Village is basically approving the same exact expansion plans they should have approved four years ago.

Presently, there is no legal reason to not approve Palmer Trinity’s site plan and if not approved will certainly bring more litigation to the village. I understand that there are certain residents who would like nothing better than delay or stop approval but these are the same individuals who have cost this Village dearly over the past six years.

So it’s time to put our sordid little past behind us. It’s time to approve Palmer Trinity’s site plan and move on. It’s time to move on and focus on actually improving the quality of life in Palmetto Bay. It’s time to move on to insure our Village is not bankrupt within the next five years. It’s time to move on and make sure our parks are run efficiently, time to move and make sure our tax dollars are being spent wisely, time to move on and elect the best representatives we can to embody what this Village actually stands for.

It’s time to stop the nonsense and begin a new and respectable history for the Village of Palmetto Bay.

David Singer

PB Election Update: Games People Play

The Village of Palmetto Bay election just got more interesting.

A new entrant filed for the district three seat currently occupied by Councilwoman Joan Lindsay. Joining unknown candidate James Shedd (Watch out Jimmy, Stanczyk is probably cooking up a special “Shedd” ordinance just for you!) in the race is first-time candidate Larissa Siegel Lara. SDM found a photo online (hope it’s you, Ms. Lara):

LSL

Ms. Lara’s campaign issues are phrased as if they were written by a long-time executive, which she was. She claims in her bio to have had 17-year career at Burger King as VP for Management and Training. Lara was educated as an engineer. According to her democracy.com website post:

The day she takes office, Larissa will hit the ground running. She will provide leadership to build a council that is collaborative and focused on building Palmetto Bay for all residents.  Her skills and decision-making capabilities will be focused on building consensus on the future of the Village.

She will lead the charge to formulate a viable long-term plan for the Village, including goals, fiscal infrastructure, and sound human resources.  The plan will consider both the revenues and expenditures to sustain and improve Village services that benefit our community. By balancing time, money, and people, the Village can develop the appropriate support system to create a better future and long-term services for Village residents.

Hard to argue, but we will want to hear more!

SDM Says: We are fascinated by the game Councilwoman Lindsay’s is playing. Is she running or not? Most sane politicians don’t wait so long that the race fills up with opponents. Ms. Lindsay may find herself in deep do-do if she relies on CCOCI to get her re-elected, especially when she is facing another woman who looks to have solid credentials.

PB: Guest Post by David Singer (With SDM Comments)

The good guys actually achieved a well-deserved win during Monday’s [June 23, 2014] special council meeting when Councilmen Patrick Fiore, Tim Schaffer and John Dubois, voted down what could have been a disaster for Village residents, Churches, Private Schools and Daycares within Palmetto Bay.

It was a grueling experience watching the Monday’s council meeting, but with the exception of Mayor Stanczyk the remaining Council members attempted to reach a compromise on the Charter Amendment. This amendment would have eliminated all outdoor lighting for non-governmental, non-residential or non-commercially zoned properties.

[SDM Comment: We disagree with Mr. Singer's characterization. The proposed charter amendment would have prohibited outdoor lighting of recreational areas (except underwater swimming pool lights) owned by religious institutions, child care facilities, private schools,  and other non-governmental public assemblies located in residentially zoning districts.  We agree that the idea is crazy and will cover lots more lighting than we were told.]

During the meeting the Village Zoning Director confirmed my suspicions that if the amendment had passed it would prohibit all lighting; basketball, tennis, ground, pathway, landscaping, etc. The amendment would supersede any prior Village Ordinance.

[SDM Comment: Mr. Singer is hitting on why this measure and the code provision are so misguided. We've asked before: Does this mean a private school's pool could not have outdoor lights for the pool deck, stairways and pathways leading to it? Is everyone supposed to bring a flashlight? Why allow the underwater lighting in the first place if it cannot be used in any practical sense?]

Unfortunately, as we heard from Mayor Stanczyk the battle is far from over. After the vote was finalized she could be heard saying “We’ll Walk”. I would assume by her comment that she will lead various sullen individuals in an initiative to collect enough signatures to place the Charter Amendment on November’s ballot. Not exactly the Mayor’s responsibility to undermine the governmental process she’s been sworn to uphold, but then again she’s hasn’t shown herself to be very ethical while in office.

[SDM Comment: If you walk away, walk away, walk away, walk away… [SDM won't] follow.]

Maybe if the Mayor spent the time researching various municipalities within Miami-Dade County she would have found there are 19 cities, 6 towns and 9 villages for a total of 34 separate municipalities. These municipalities, along with Unincorporated Miami-Dade, represent 2.6 million residents.

[SDM Comment: What? Me? Do research? I'll tell you what you can do with your stinking research!]

None of the municipalities, including Unincorporated Miami-Dade County have their lighting code defined or guided by a City Charter. It’s just not standard or appropriate.

Could there be something that all the other Municipalities in Miami Dade County know that our Council doesn’t? Could what the Mayor is trying to pass be unconstitutional? Could it lead to more lawsuits for the Village of Palmetto Bay? Could the residents be footing the bill for more legal fees? Isn’t eight years of litigation enough?

What is really driving this venture into unknown and potentially very expensive territory?

Well for one thing, there is the location of Councilwoman Joan Lindsay’s home. Her house is approximately 100 feet away from the Palmer Trinity property line. Joan Lindsay was an original director, president and vice-president of the Concerned Citizens of Old Cutler, Inc. (CCOCI) for years. She has a serious conflict of interest and ethically shouldn’t even be voting on any issues related to Palmer Trinity.

[SDM Comment: This here would be an appearance of a conflict of interest, though not legally a conflict. Just FYI.]

There is also the fact that The Village of Palmetto Bay has spent over a million dollars in legal fees fighting Joan Lindsay’s and the CCOCI’s war against Palmer Trinity, which they would love to continue. Mayor Stanczyk, Joan Lindsay and the CCOCI all know that the Charter change will bring more litigation to the Village.

Unfortunately, we as residents have all experienced a history of Mayor Stanczyk and Joan Lindsay spending taxpayer’s money for Palmer Trinity litigation.

Simply put, all the Churches, Schools and residents in the Village have become collateral damage in a war that has nothing to do with us. Our hard earned tax dollars have become collateral damage. The Real Estate rights of Churches and Schools have become collateral damage, as seen by what happened to Alexander Montessori School when they wanted to expand. Alexander Montessori School has lost thousands of dollars in revenue due to a war which is raging between Mayor Shelley Stanczyk and Joan Lindsay and Palmer Trinity.

The passing of this Charter Amendment will commence a cycle of new litigation but this time it just won’t be with Palmer Trinity. It will be with the various churches and other educational institutions in the Village.

There are both Federal and State laws which prohibit the type of action the Mayor and Councilwoman are attempting. The Village Attorney has stated on record that this Charter Amendment could bring future litigation.

[SDM Comment: Mr. Singer is being a little misleading here and you know we can't stand such effrontery. The Village Attorney is quite comfortable that the proposed charter amendment was constitutional and permissible under RLUIPA and other statutes. He noted that anyone can sue, but he was clear that he believed such suits would not prevail, though he also stated such suits would not be frivolous. We're not sure Mr. Lehtinen is correct with respect to the level of scrutiny applied to the question: he says strict scrutiny would not apply, where we think it would under RLUIPA's statutory scheme. Anyone attempting to sue has a hard road, regardless.]

If anyone were to question the likelihood of future litigation please look no further than The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. When filed it will takes years to resolve, just as the Palmer litigation has taken years to resolve.

If asked to sign a petition respectfully decline and warn all your friends and neighbors who live in Palmetto Bay not to sign. If the petitioner tells you it’s about stadium lighting don’t believe them as they are not being honest. The Charter Amendment they are attempting to pass is written to prohibit all lighting at institutions which should be respected not discriminated against by the Village of Palmetto Bay.

[SDM Says: Right on!]

David Singer

PB: Stanczyk – And the mob will rule…or maybe not

Palmetto Bay’s village council took up a controversial measure proposed by Mayor Shelley Stanczyk on June 23rd, which would prohibit by charter any form of lighting to be installed on religious facilities, daycare centers, private schools and other nonpublic facilities.

Immediately upon her measure losing – even after a heroic effort by Councilman Patrick Fiore and Councilwoman Joan Lindsay to find a compromise – Mme. Mayor Stanczyk’s true reason for pushing the measure surfaced. After the vote went down 3 to 2, “we’ll walk it,” she said.

There you go. Incumbent Mayor Stanczyk, who has so far failed to report a single contribution for her re-election, has a re-election strategy of walking door-to-door to scare the public in person. We can only imagine what Mme. Mayor and her minions intend to say to the village people as they canvass unsuspecting residents.

We have sufficient reason for trepidation given the Mayor’s long questionable history regarding telling the truth to those who may wish to vote for her.

In a very recent effort, Concerned Citizens Of Cutler Inc. and Mrs. Stanczyk told hundreds if not thousands of residents that Palmer Trinity wanted to install “stadium lighting” on its athletic fields. This lie is most egregious since Mrs. Stanczyk knows that the code does not permit such lighting and would never be approved by a village council.

What also troubles us is the mob mentality that permeates village politics. Mrs. Lindsay and Mrs. Stanczyk claim that the village charter is the people’s document. Implicit in their statement is an acknowledgment that schools like Palmer Trinity are somehow excluded from the charter because of their non-person or non-taxable status (as former candidate Bev Gerald and village gadfly Warren Lovely shamelessly remind us at every meeting).

Mrs. Lindsay and Mrs. Stanczyk endorse the majority’s ability to legislate away the property rights of religious, nonpublic facilities. (If you doubt the master plan, note that both Mrs. Lindsay and Mrs. Stanczyk parroted the line that “hundreds of people sent emails” against the red herring stadium lights. Not much of a big deal given that the village has thousands of residents, but plenty for the purpose of scaring those who fail to pay attention to what’s really going on.)

Fortunately, three courageous members of the council (Mr. Fiore, Mr. Dubois and Mr. Schaffer) decided against placing on the ballot Mrs. Stanczyk’s divisive and politically motivated charter proposal.

SDM Says: Which leaves the decision up to us… If you think we should be zoning by charter and that we ought to create second class property owners based on religious or nonpublic status, then by all means open your door to Mayor Stanczyk. No doubt she will leave her re-election literature with you, too. However, if you think our village is being drawn once again into a state of perpetual strife, then you can tell Mrs. Stanczyk that you disagree with her plan to further divide this village and that you will be looking for different leadership this fall. You can also tell her to leave our dogs alone.

PB: England’s Fightin’ Words

The Miami Herald published online a Soapbox letter from village mayor candidate Peter England. Most of you will see it in your Sunday paper, but SDM thinks you may want to preview it here:

Your June 8 story concerning the site of a new fire station in Palmetto Bay suggests that I might be unhappy with this outcome. Since my mayoral campaign identified the acute lack of Fire/Rescue coverage on the east side of our village as the greatest single public safety concern in Palmetto Bay, how could I be anything but pleased with the proposed 14200 Old Cutler Rd. location?
The issue my campaign raised was the lack of attention being given to this critical issue by the Palmetto Bay Village Council. At no time, either during a council meeting or council workshop, was this issue discussed, in spite of the fact that the Palmetto Bay Village Voice raised the concern at every council meeting.

During the presentation by the Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Department at the June 2 council meeting, the council received the same new information as I about this new alternative site. They were there as spectators, not leaders. I commend Miami-Dade Fire Rescue for their diligence on this issue, and will continue to demand not one but two new fire stations as a central theme in my mayoral campaign. Only two stations will provide complete coverage of the entire village.

By drawing attention to this crucial issue, my mayoral campaign has finally gotten the council to focus on this public safety issue after 11 years of neglect. Now that they have recognized the importance of this issue, It’s time for the Village Council to step up and get involved.

Peter England, Palmetto Bay

(Emphasis added by SDM.)

Eleven years? Hmmm… Let’s see, who was leading the village during the past eleven years? Answer:

Mayor: Eugene Flinn (2002-2010); Shelley Stanczyk (2010-Present).

Vice Mayor: Linda Robinson (2002-2008); Brian Pariser (2008-2012);John Dubois (2012-Present)

District 1: Ed Feller (2002-2010); Patrick Fiore (2010-Present)

District 2: Paul Neidhart (2002-2010) Howard Tendrich (2008-2012); Tim Schaffer (2012-Present)

District 3: John Breder (2002-2006); Shelley Stanczyk (2006-2010); Joan Lindsay (2010- Present)

You’ve covered a lot of territory there, Mr. England…pretty much every elected official to have set his or her backside on a Palmetto Bay taxpayer-funded chair. Not to mention Village Manager Ron Williams and his predecessors.

SDM Wonders: Are you all going take this lying down?

 

PB: Quick Bites – Elections, Etc. Edition

Waivering in the Mayor’s Race

Campaign reports due on June 10 are already loaded up on the village website. See Clerk’s Election 2014 page. (Nice job over there in the Clerk’s office!)

Let’s start with the most obvious takeaway: Incumbent Mayor Shelley Stanczyk still has not raised a single dollar from anyone in Palmetto Bay other than herself! For the second reporting period in a row, she filed a “waiver,” meaning she has neither raised nor spent any money on her campaign. That a sitting, incumbent (perhaps recumbent is a better word) mayor has raised exactly zilch with fewer than 146 days to the general election in political terms is a cluster___.

Second takeaway: Former Mayor Eugene Flinn and returning aspirant Peter England both have about $10,000 available to their campaigns. England still looks to be working the fundraising scene with more vigor while Flinn is self-funding. Fiore lags at $3,000 available.

Most interesting takeaway: All tolled (or is it told?) the mayoral candidates have raised about$27,000, which is less than either candidate in District 1.

District 1: Working hard and making bedfellows

First takeaway: Both Karyn Cunningham and David Zisman know how to raise money. (Just think if either were in the mayor’s race now…he or she would be the favorite!) Cunningham continues to accumulate money; she’s raised ~$28,000 and still has ~$23,000 in the bank.

Second takeaway: David Zisman has made a friend in the charter school business. Wayne Rosen who is building the village’s first charter school in the downtown looks to have raised Zisman at least $4,000 this cycle. SDM notes that Zisman likes party supplies. He spent ~$640 on paper hats and noise makers! (Just kidding, it was all spent on “party supplies.”)

Most interesting takeaway: David Zisman leads all comers with more than $25,000 in the bank and ready to go. SDM thinks somebody is taking this gig seriously this time.

District 3: The mysterious Shedd is unopposed

First takeaway: Unknown James A. Shedd is in law enforcement so three of his campaign contributions were made without reporting a physical address. SDM deduces that these contributions came from retired cops so their addresses are undisclosed so bad guys can’t locate them. Palmetto Bay voters may want to note that the bulk of Shedd’s contributions come from outside the village, which means exactly…nothing.

Second takeaway: Mr. Shedd has managed to not bounce any checks for one campaign report in a row. Bravo.

Most interesting takeaway: While the intrepid Mme. Mayor boasts zero contributions, her mentor and savant, incumbent District 3 Councilwoman Joan Lindsay doesn’t even have a campaign. With less than 5 months to go, Lindsay hasn’t even bothered to sign up to run. Is there a surprise coming here? Maybe hubby is going to run instead? Only if the blog gods have a sense of humor…

Speaking of a sense of humor – this one ain’t funny

Regular guest poster David Singer left SDM a comment that we didn’t publish. (We do that often when people want to send us messages without disclosing their identities. We’re very secretive at SDM…woooooo.)

Singer has filed a suit against Gary Pastorella and CCOCI. (Don’t you wish you were Pastorella’s lawyer? He’s like the gift that keeps on giving!)

Anyway, the lawsuit is a “Petition for Pure Bill of Discovery.” The purpose of the suit is to demand certain records to determine if the infamous Pastorella email of a few weeks ago contained defamatory material that was communicated to others.

The upshot is that Singer wants to know to whom Pastorella and CCOCI sent the email(s) and exactly what was said in the communications related to them. SDM presumes that if Singer or his employer were defamed and can prove it, they may serve village gadfly Pastorella and his CCOCI overlords with a suit for money damages.

SDM says: Mr. Singer may have a hard time getting over the hurdle since he has become something of a public figure in our little burgh, but his employer may be the ultimate plaintiff in any event. It’s much harder to prove defamation against a public figure, but businesses routinely knock down loud-mouthed activists using SLAPP suits. SDM isn’t a fan of the tactic, but everyone has a breaking point and Singer may have reached his.

 

PB Guest Post: Philosophical David Singer

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

-Arthur Schopenhauer

Last week I published a letter to Councilman Patrick Fiore that was extremely ill-timed but certainly not ill-conceived. I purposely broached a subject that mixes religious values and politics to make a very specific point.

There were some readers who understood my concerns but some were so violently opposed to what I had written that the feedback I received is not fit for publication. A majority of the negative emails requested that I never use religion to debate a political position.

The separation of Church and State has been debated since the First Amendment to the Constitution was written. It continues to be hotly debated when discussing abortion rights and gay marriage. I am not the first person who has brought religion into a political arena nor will I be the last.

The truth is I did not make this a religious issue. Mayor Shelley Stanczyk’s legislation (below) made it a religious issue.

“Lighting shall not be installed or used for outdoor recreational areas, except for underwater swimming pool lighting, by religious facilities, private schools, child care facilities or other non-governmental public assembly uses in any single-family residential zoning district. This provision shall be self-executing and become effective upon the date of adoption by the electorate.” [Emphasis added by SDM.]

Once again, this Charter Amendment attacks the land rights of Churches, Schools and Day Cares Facilities in the Village of Palmetto Bay. These are the same land rights afforded to every single homeowner in the Village of Palmetto Bay. In fact, I have received numerous legal opinions that state this resolution is simply unconstitutional.

Attacking religious or educational institutions is not new for Mayor Shelley Stanczyk or Councilwoman Joan Lindsay. This is the same tactic they used to rally their troops for the past four years. It helped them get elected. Think about “Neighborhood Protection Ordinance”.

It’s hard to accept that any resident who lives in the Village of Palmetto Bay could be so narrow-minded to contemplate Churches and Schools shouldn’t have the same basic rights to any amenity as an individual homeowner. It defines the word discrimination. It defines the last four years of the Mayor’s tenure.

To apologize for my letter to Mr. Fiore is to admit I’ve done something wrong. After the past four years, we need elected officials who govern based on integrity and honesty. I believe one of the benefits of religion is to teach those principles, which can be used to govern and lead.

I have confidence that the residents of Palmetto Bay understand the need for those qualities and, if lacking, these individuals don’t deserve to be a Council Member.

Just because you have the ability to shut your eyes to the truth doesn’t mean that the truth is not present.

David Singer

+++

SDM Note: We don’t always agree with Mr. Singer. In fact, we’ve written that we would not have written the Fiore letter in that way. On the other hand, the self-righteous howling that followed the letter were out of all proportion to its contents. Mayor Shelley Stanczyk and Council Member Joan Lindsay injected religion into the village code and now want to inject the subject into the village charter. Doing so is discriminatory on its face and voters must reject this unethical pandering. Bravo Mr. Singer for standing up to the bullies.

PB: Crackpot Crazies of Cutler Ink

For some unknowable reason, certain FOSDMs think it’s funny to send us the CCOCI emails. Two arrived over the weekend; the first filled with the usual junk, but the second overflowing with venom directed at occasional SDM contributor David Singer titled “David Singer’s despicable Open Letter (email) to Councilman Patrick Fiore.”

Read what those lovely personages had to say about the Boy Wonder:

We find it despicable and shameful that David Singer injects religion into what is clearly a zoning matter regarding stadium lights in residential neighborhoods. We don’t think our elected representatives should make decisions based on their religious beliefs. Mr. Singer owes a big apology to Patrick Fiore and all the residents of Palmetto Bay.

First off, are we the only ones who think it’s hilariously ironic that CCOCI is sending out emails to defend Patrick Fiore? Holy Toledo! And the lion shall lie down with the lambs…or something.

Secondly, David Singer injected religion into a zoning matter???? Okay, we know the cocktails flow on Fridays at Crackpot Crazies’ happy hour, but have any of you read either the village code or Mayor Stanczyk’s proposed charter amendment? Here is Stanczyk’s language, which closely tracks the current code:

Lighting shall not be installed or used for outdoor recreational areas, except for underwater swinlming pool lighting, by religious facilities, private schools, child care facilities or other non-governmental public assembly uses in any single-family residential zoning district. (Emphasis added by SDM.)

We understand that CCOCI sends emails out to any poor bastard who signed up for the village’s e-currents and that they are shameless in their willingness to mislead the public, but this is Orwellian.

Later in the email, CCOCI drags out the canard about “stadium lighting” as if the Dolphins will be playing somewhere in Palmetto Bay.

Recently over 500 residents sent emails to the Village Council and staff requesting no stadium style lights in residential neighborhoods as proof of their desires. Singer’s open letter to Patrick Fiore sought to make a zoning issue about lights into a case of religious discrimination. All the while Singer is attempting to disguise the real issue of outside interests and developers working against the residents’ quality of life, the quiet enjoyment of our homes, and our peaceful residential bedroom community.

CCOCI conveniently – rather, intentionally – misstates the code provisions that Councilwoman Lindsay wisely added that limit the ambient light permitted anywhere in the village. Desperation forces people to lie through their teeth, apparently. And seriously, how do we permit CCOCI to compare private schools and churches with “developers working against the residents’ quality of life” blah, blah, blah? Last time I checked, all those folks attending religious services on the weekends seem to think they are improving the quality of their lives.

The rest of the email is repetitive and dull until “the Stanczyk paragraph” appears:

Stanczyk, Lindsay and other council members are routinely invited to church and school functions. Usually only Stanczyk, Lindsay and Fiore attend. Mayor Stanczyk started the School Compact Advisory Board to support our local schools. Mayor Stanczyk and Councilwoman Lindsay have supported countless church, private school and public school functions through their participation. Mayor Stanczyk is a product of faith based education and taught and volunteered in private and public schools for 12 years and Councilwoman Lindsay taught in public schools for 30 years.

Sounds like the back of a Stanczyk for Mayor mailer. Her defense appears to be that she and Mrs. Lindsay have attended lots of religious events so their motives can’t be questioned when they can’t be single out churches and religious schools for special regulations. “Hey, some of my best friends go to church!”

Fact 1: As we have written here several times, Mrs. Stanczyk’s School Compact Advisory Board specifically excludes both charter public schools and all private schools. When Mme. Mayor claims to “support our local schools” she doesn’t mean ALL of our local schools – just the ones that are clamped on the public teat.

Fact 2: Mrs. Stanczyk – really Mrs. Lindsay – wrote the code provisions with the clear intention of treating religious facilities differently. Their stated purpose is to prevent private gathering places from having the amenities granted to public amenities regardless of the use involved. Only government-sanctioned events will be permitted after dark in Palmetto Bay. Thanks to these two we are re-living the dark ages.

Fact 3: CCOCI started its reign of terror because they – especially their leader Gary Pastorella – opposed Old Cutler Presbyterian Church’s plans to expand on a lot they own across from the main church buildings. Zoning exists to protect all property owners, not just homeowners, because the government recognizes that we as a society need places of worship just as we need ranch-style homes.

SDM Says: People constantly comment on this site asking us why we publish anonymously. Well, take a gander at what the power brokers in this village will do when a resident steps out into the sunlight and speaks his mind. They will drag his employer’s name through the mud without giving the consequences a second thought. That the Mayor of this village and Councilwoman Lindsay condone CCOCI’s behavior speaks volumes about their personal morality and ethics. Prove us wrong ladies.

PB Guest Post by David Singer: Stanczyk as Nero

Mayor Shelley Stanczyk and Councilwoman Joan Lindsay fiddle while Village residents lose Property Value.

Property values have been increasing everywhere in Miami Dade County with the exception of the Village of Palmetto Bay. Real Estate increased an average value of 5.6% across Miami Dade County between 2013 and 2014 with Palmetto Bay at a stagnant 2.5%. Increases in other cities include Cutler Bay 4.8%, Aventura 5.8%, Doral 3.3%, Key Biscayne 8.5%, Pinecrest 3.7%, Miami Beach 8.9%, Coral Gables 3.5%, and Unincorporated Dade County 4.1%. In fact, Village of Palmetto Bay had the lowest rate of increase in real estate values as compared to 95% of Miami Dade County.

While our current Council Members, including Mayor Shelley Stanczyk and Councilwoman Joan Lindsay, continue to be obsessed with Palmer Trinity, NPO and lighting at Churches and Schools, the rest of the county is kicking our butts in economic recovery.

The majority of Village residents will use the equity in their homes as their nest egg in retirement. As most of us know, our homes contain the major source of equity that will eventually either be handed down to the next generation or used during our golden years.

Last year Palmetto Bay residents would have been better investing their home equity in a money market account than the return they received from Palmetto Bay’s housing recovery.

2013-2014 was not the first year that taxable values increased faster in cities like Pinecrest, Coral Gables, Doral, Aventura and Cutler Bay. Practically the same results were seen last year.

I find this unacceptable. We live in one of the nicest areas in Miami Dade County. I was assured during Village of Palmetto Bay incorporation that home values would increase at a faster rate than in Unincorporated Dade.

With the present leadership in Palmetto Bay this just isn’t happening.

The issue is that a couple of our elected officials continue to take their eyes off the ball. Mayor Shelley Stanczyk and Joan Lindsay have been so wrapped up with their hate for, and litigation with, Palmer Trinity that they can’t govern this Village properly.

John Dubois, Tim Shaffer and Patrick Fiore have had to play defense against frivolous ordinances and resolutions by Shelley Stanczyk and Joan Lindsay against dog owners, churches and schools distracting these Councilmen from accomplishing positive things in our Village. Mayor Stanczyk and Joan Lindsay’s actions could be costing you tens of thousands of dollars you need for retirement.

Which brings me to the resolution that Mayor Shelley Stanczyk is placing on the agenda tonight, Monday, June 2nd. It reads:

“Lighting shall not be installed or used for outdoor recreational areas, except for underwater swimming pool lighting, by religious facilities, private schools, child care facilities or other non-governmental public assembly uses in any single-family residential zoning district. This provision shall be self-executing and become effective upon the date of adoption by the electorate.”

Once again, as her ill-advised dog barking ordinance was (5 barks will cost you $300) a couple of months ago, her resolution is a pandering to the CCOCI and a few local residents who are bothered by lights. This resolution would not only make it illegal for tennis court lighting, basketball lighting but also for ground lighting in landscaping and along walking paths. We’re not talking about restricting 70, 80 and 90 foot light poles, we’re talking about every types of lighting. I remind you that all residential houses are permitted the same lighting that she is trying to eliminate at churches, schools and child care facilities.

This type of legislation is discrimination and idiocy at best. This type of ordinance will bring more litigation to the Village as it is unconstitutional. It is also extremely dangerous as lighting deters crime and helps to reduce “slip and falls.”

So there you have it, a Mayor and Councilwoman who are so worried about dogs barking, shining lights and their disdain for Palmer Trinity that they’ve lost focus on the big picture. Home values  – citizens’ nest eggs – are rising slower in our Village than almost anywhere else in Miami Dade County. Anyway you spin it, it’s a losing situation for Palmetto Bay constituents.

David Singer

PB Showdown: You Can’t Have It Both Ways

Three votes.

That’s all that separates Palmetto Bay from continuing down a path of anti-church, anti-private school and anti-day care alienation or down a path of reasonable accommodation.

Three votes.

The June 2 village agenda contains an item by Mayor Shelley Stanczyk that will place before the voters a measure designed to permanently bar by charter any use of outdoor lighting in recreational areas for non-public gathering places.

The very same agenda contains an item by Councilman Tim Schaffer that changes the village code to permit limited lighting on those recreation areas.

The two items cannot work together; they are mutually exclusive.

The village council breaks down as follows on these items as SDM reads the tea leaves:

  • Stanczyk item: For: Stanczyk, Lindsay; Against: Schaffer; Undecided: Fiore, Dubois.
  • Schaffer item: For: Schaffer; Against: Stanczyk, Lindsay, Dubois; Undecided: Fiore.

Based on our reading, village voters will get the chance to bar lights forever, unless the facility wants to install underwater lighting in a pool.

The curious votes here are those of Dubois and Fiore.

Vice Mayor John Dubois looks to SDM to be a populist. He notes his own suffering from loud music at Thalatta Estate, but he also was voted in by the opponents of the last cabal that ran this village. He insisted that Mr. Schaffer postpone the vote on his item, while at the same time proposing some (perhaps) reasonable amendments to it. We put him in the “no” category for the Schaffer item based on his very negative comments and seeming willingness to “love the bill to death.”

Councilman Patrick Fiore, also a candidate for Mayor, looks to SDM to be fence-straddling. His antipathy to anything Mrs. Stanczyk proposes is palpable to anyone paying attention. Yet, he joined the chorus in demanding that the Schaffer item be postponed. Mr. Fiore’s campaign is on life support already and his votes on these items will either seal his fate as a Stanczyk clone or set him apart as supporting non-public institutions. As SDM notes regularly in this blog, sitting on the fence just gives both sides someone to shoot at.

SDM Says: Make no mistake: these votes on Monday will be pivotal in deciding the character of Palmetto Bay going forward. We as residents cannot expect private property owners – especially those with religious foundations – to go gently into that good night when their rights are being trampled. Sure, Palmer may decide to take half-a-loaf today just so they can proceed, but that does not mean that other facilities will be so willing to meekly stand down. The larger question is whether those of us with kids who also work late should be able to use non-public facilities after sunset. Or, does a small group of neighbors get to decide that nothing happens after dark in Palmetto Bay? Mr. Fiore and Mr. Dubois will decide on Monday night.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56 other followers